Sunday, June 04, 2006

Jeff Rense - an Agent of CoIntelPro in action...

Hi, I am back!

Today, I would like to talk about Jeff Rense. Yes, THE Jeff Rense, the guy behind the leading alternative news website, or is he?

Check this curious article:

Read it carefully. What caught my attention was this:

"As it happens, Patsy Smullin does remember Jeff Rense, and in two different telephone conversations I had with her over the past few days, she confirmed that he did have a position at her television station for a brief time as a reporter and news anchor. Smullin stressed that Jeff Rense, or "a guy calling himself Jeff Rense" (her words), was employed at KOBI (an NBC affiliate) from June 1983 to May 1984, and she is not aware of him working at any other station in the state of Oregon either prior to his employment at KOBI-TV or afterward."

Me: everything seems to be nice, right? Wrong. Jeff alleges on his website that he has made 5,000 newscasts. I wonder how he managed to score so many hours when he worked just 1 short year. Simple math reveals that he would have to work 14 hours per day for 7 days a week. How likely is that?

Then Patsy continues:

"Patsy had more to say. She revealed that in her experience as Jeff Rense's employer (and this is a direct quote), "He was not known for his honesty." Think about it. Patsy Smullin was Rense's employer some twenty-odd years ago. After all this time, the characteristic that has remained clearly in her memory is that "he was not known for his honesty". What does that say to you?"

Me: indeed! What does it tell us about good ol' Jeff? He is not so honest, yet he runs the leading alternative news source. Is it just a co-incidence and he changed for better or he was picked to run the show exactly because he is... wait, let me quote Ms. Patsy:

"When asked if she could elaborate on the comment she'd made regarding Rense not being known for his honesty, her response was: "Sure. He was a compulsive liar." Also, when questioned as to the claim that Jeff anchored and produced "5000 newscasts," Patsy Smullin laughed heartily and stated, "This is absolutely false. He never did that here." "

Me: Jeff Rense is a compulsive liar? Well, based on accounts of his employer he could not have done those 5000 newscasts while at Kobi-TV. Then where and when? It remains his sweet secret for the time being, but I suspect that we have just stumbled upon the evidence that Jeff is not exactly who he paints himself to be. He is hiding something, meanwhile he pretends to be a highly respectable host of a show. The only question is: who is behind him? Whom does he serve? Truth? I doubt. I guess we are witnessing a disinfo agent running a website with a major funding from some US agency to deceive people. He was hired to do the job he knows best: to lie and disinform the public. Fortunately, slowly his own lies start to haunt him...

Till the next time.... stay tuned.


Sunday, January 08, 2006

The Above Top Secret!

I am back after the break with some more pieces of truth that is meant to stimulate my readers' thinking.

I have found a very interesting blog that prompted me to post to my own blog after this long break. Here is the link:

The subject of this blog is: COINTELPRO Updates: Above Top Secret Forum.

I suggest that everyone who reads this blog should pay attention to the COINTELPRO or the Counter Intelligence Program. Agents of this program saw disinformation all over the net and this article shows clearly that these people are connected to the government of the United States and paid to disseminate propaganda like the fellow named Christian Bailey

Let's see how the story started.

"Things have been pretty interesting around here in the past week. Seems that Joe Quinn's critique of the Above Top Secret forum posting about the 757 that did NOT hit the Pentagon has hit a nerve."

"The first indication that we had that something was up was the fact that the Signs of The Times site statistics had a bit of a surge. Now we keep a pretty good eye on our site statistics because we like to know what subjects really interest our readers. So when there is a surge, we know we are doing our job. This is most particularly true with the publication of the Pentagon Strike video: obviously, so many people "resonated" to the facts presented in this video that the current number of viewers is approacing 600 million."

"Yes, that's right: 600 MILLION. It will soon be one of the most widely disseminated items ever to be published on the internet. For the "Powers That Be," that's a problem."

"The result of this statistical analysis is the fact that we KNOW that hundreds of millions of people do NOT believe that a 757 hit the Pentagon. They would not be avidly sharing the Pentagon Strike video with their family, friends, acquaintances, to the extent that they have done so if they were not trying to use it as a way of communicating something that is difficult to put into words, not to mention dangerous considering the Fascist takeover of America by Bush and the Neocons."

Me: From the fragment above we learn something that NO cooked opinion poll will ever show. Namely, that there is A LOT of people who actually do not BUY the official version of the 911 Pentagon story. No wonder. Watch the video! Facts speak for themselves. Obviously, such a situation is not what the Neocons can tolerate too long, therefore COINTELPRO agents get their assignment and the deception campaign gets started...

"Enter: Above Top Secret Forum."

Me: Or better: Enter the Matrix!

"Well, actually, we hadn't really paid too much attention to the ATS forum until it became almost a daily event for someone to send us, or post to our modest discussion forum, the link to this ATS post by "CatHerder." (Gee, even the name of the poster gives a COINTELPRO impression; imagine someone trying to herd cats?! That's probably how the PTB view people - a bunch of disorderly cats that need to be herded in a particular direction.) We didn't know that the ATS forum moderators had made thinly veiled negative references to our own work in their manipulative posts as we show in the Frozen Fish analysis."

Me: Notice the nickname of ATS guy: "CatHerder." It is good to pay attention to names of posters on such forums as the ATS, since they often reveal the COINTELPRO agent(s). Herding cats? Gee!!! I wonder what for?

"We ambled over to ATS to read the article and recognized it immediately for what it was: a slick, manipulative piece of journalism designed to take in individuals who are easily bamboozled. After the first time or two that the link was posted to our forum, then people began to try to post the entire article. We rejected it a dozen times or more simply because it was what it was: disinformation. The fact is, we are in the news publishing business because we intend it as a teaching tool, and we try to check material for validity and to weed out as many lies as possible so our readers don't have to waste a lot of their valuable time reading garbage. Unlike sites such as and others, which publish just about anything indiscriminately, we DO try to publish responsibly. If we utilize mainstream articles that we suspect are "agenda slanted," we try to add comments pointing out the obvious, or at least publish such an article juxtaposed against another that makes clear the agenda. We also use flashbacks to remind readers that a current article may be saying something exactly the opposite of what was said a few weeks, months, or even years ago. In short, our idea is to help readers learn to think, to spot the deceptions, and to develop or refine their own internal BS meters."

"At the same time, as noted, we DO keep a close eye on our statistics so that we know what items interest the greatest number of people which then prompts us to do more research on those items so as to bring to our readers more material that will satisfy that desire for information."

"As I said, we hadn't really paid a lot of attention to the ATS people up to the point in time when a cadre of what we think of as COINTELPRO "floaters" repeatedly tried to force us to publish the ATS CatHerder piece on our own website. Based on our assessment of the piece, it would have been the same thing as publishing - and giving credibility to - disinformation. We simply weren't going to do it - without commentary as we do when we publish any piece that we consider to be "agenda directed." The problem was, it was such a long and slippery piece that it needed quite a bit of writing just to deal with the nonsense presented as "logic." We didn't have the time or the inclination. Yet, over time, the questions from sincere readers kept coming in and made us aware that the ATS article was obviously an item that our readers wanted us to address."

"In the end, that was exactly what we did: we published it with commentary."

Me: Now, what this piece tells me is that how the COINTELPRO strategy works. I would like to attract some attention to it. First, the virtual forum is created such as the 'Above Top Secret'. Catchy name, isn't it? Suggests that you can learn some serious secrets there. Nothing farther from truth. The forum gets some serious bux from the government through proxies, judging by its appearance and contents. It attracts a lot of readers. Attention of the cats is carefully vectored into desired direction by a slick, manipulative journalism. Next, a genuine website disseminating facts is selected as a target and agents try to create a link between the COINTELPRO forum and the genuine website. They try to persuade editors of the genuine website to publish some article that represents disinformation. If COINTELPRO agents manage to achieve their goal then they can reach even more readers with their piece of propaganda and later, naturaly, discredit the COINTELPRO forum and the genuine website through its association with the discredited forum. Works often, unless website editors are aware of the tactics. That was the case here. Have a look:

"The very next thing that happened - within hours of writing the above - was that we received an email from Above Top Secret as follows:"

"Mark - From : USA wrote : I am disgusted by your accusation that, LLP is a "Government funded damage control outlet" I ask that you retract that lie."
"My partners and I have spent the last several years building that site and have NEVER received a nickel from ANY government, never been asked to do ANYTHING for or by ANY government and NEVER WILL."
"The fact we attract logical members who present THIER analysis and ask that other members treat them with COURTEOUSNESS and keep the discussion at an ADULT level sans flames and rediculous off topic commentary does NOT make us anything more or less than what we are. The number ONE destination on the internet to FREELY Deny Ignorance."
"It is truly SAD that when a site allows ALL sides of an issue to be heard people like YOU who believe hook line and sinker there is a conspiracy where there may or may not be one, feel the need to falsely accuse us of being crooked. It makes me SICK and SAD for you.
You obviously haven't read the THOUSANDS of posts that actually SUPPORT your perspective on our site, no that would be too much work wouldn't it?"
"Much easier to cast a negative light upon our site in the hopes of getting yourself some attention isn't it?"
"Thoroughly disappointed in and DISGUSTED with YOU."
", LLP"

Me: the problem the COINTELPRO agents encountered was that the editors added their commentary for the benefit of their readers, where they exposed manipulations of the ATS article. That, naturally, was not what agents desired thus the above mail. Notice how many emotional trigger words there are. They are meant to trigger emotional reaction in the person reading this mail. However, the editors of this particular site are quite curious people as it seems and like to dig in the dirt. They started an investigation and what they discovered:

"I did a trace route on, the Node Name is listed and maintained by the government.
IP Address 213.206.128 213.206.129 213.206.130
Node Name Gov-bb21-lan-14 Gov-bb22-lan-15 Gov-bb23-lan-16
Location Langley, Virginia
MS 60
Network Used (for military network information)
It was difficult to get the IP Address, It was spoofed and looped over 9 times. Anyway Langley, Virginia is where the CIA headquarters is. I'm more than concerned."

Does it start making sense to you? The Above Top Secret website is GOVERNMENT sponsored. By deception...

I leave it for my readers' perusal.

Saturday, April 02, 2005

American Foreign Policy - Pure Evil? Or Just The American Way?

I would like to draw reader's attention to the following article written by editors of the Signs of the Times alternative news website. It is entitiled "American Foreign Policy - Pure Evil? Or Just The American Way?"

It brings important truths about the Afghan wars to the light.

Here is some history of Afghanistan:

"In 1973 Dr. Mohammad Daoud declared a new Republic of Afghanistan, ousting the monarch government of Mohammed Zaher Shah in a bloodless coup d'etat. Daoud was an extreme conservative and ruled as absolute dictator. In response to the oppressive policy of the new regime the People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan PDPA was formed. On April 26, 1978 Daoud's ordered the arrest of almost the entire leadership of the PDPA. The progressive masses in Kabul saw the arrests as an attempt to annihilate the PDPA, just as the military junta had done to the workers' parties in Chile in 1973 (with US backing). An uprising by the lower ranks of the military freed the popular party leader, Nur Mohammad Taraki. Within a day, Daoud was overthrown and a revolutionary government proclaimed, headed by Taraki."

Me: this is how the story begins. The revolutionary government is established in Afghanistan, let's see what is does accoring to the CIA's own report:

"According to the CIA's own casebook in Afghanistan:"

"Before the revolution, 5 percent of Afghanistan's rural landowners owned more than 45 percent of the arable land. A third of the rural people were landless laborers, sharecroppers or tenants. "

"Debts to the landlords and to money lenders "were a regular feature of rural life. An indebted farmer turned over half his crop each year to the money lender.

Me: essentially feudal society in 20th century.

""When the PDPA took power, it quickly moved to remove both landownership inequalities and usury." Decree number six of the revolution canceled mortgage debts of agricultural laborers, tenants and small landowners."

"The revolutionary regime set up extensive literacy programs, especially for women. It printed textbooks in many languages-Dari, Pashtu, Uzbek, Turkic and Baluchi. "The government trained many more teachers, built additional schools and kindergartens, and instituted nurseries for orphans," says the country study."

"Before the revolution, female illiteracy had been 96.3 percent in Afghanistan. Rural illiteracy of both sexes was 90.5 percent."

"By 1985 there had been an 80-percent increase in hospital beds. The government initiated mobile medical units and brigades of women and young people to go to the undeveloped countryside and provide medical services to the peasants for the first time."

"Among the very first decrees of the revolutionary regime were to prohibit bride-price and give women freedom of choice in marriage. "Historically," said the U.S. manual, "gender roles and women's status have been tied to property relations. Women and children tend to be assimilated into the concept of property and to belong to a male."

"Before the revolution abride who did not exhibit signs of virginity on the wedding night could be murdered by her father and/or brothers."

"After the revolution, young women in the cities, where the new government's authority was strong, could tear off the veil, freely go out in public, attend school and get a job. They were organized in the Democratic Women's Organization of Afghanistan, founded in 1965 by Dr. Anahita Ratebzada.

Me: Not bad for a revolutionary government. This would have never happened in USA under Bush.

"The revolution and the establishment of the social government under Taraki challenged the old fundamentalist Islamic order. Afghanistan was slowly being turned into a progressive and libertarian country with a somewhat secular government providing equal rights for all."

"What was the US government's response?"

"The CIA began building a mercenary army, recruiting feudal Afghan warlords and their servants for a "holy war" against the "communists", who had liberated "their" women and "their" peasants. Washington spent billions of dollars every year on the war.

Me: why I am not surprized. In fact, it was the US that started to train the army that later became the terrorists of War on Terror.

"Now remember, the reforms in Afghanistan began in 1978 and were gaining pace over the following years."

"In an interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski in "Le Nouvel Observateur" Jan 15-21, 1998, p.76, Brzezinski tells us:"

"Brzezinski: According to the official version of history,CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, closely guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention."

"The "pro-Soviet regime" mentioned here was the socialst government of Tariki that was advocating women's rights and education for all."

"Question: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired this Soviet entry into war and looked to provoke it?"

"Brzezinski: It isn't quite that. We didn't push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would.

Me: in other words the US provoked the war in Afghanistan, like it has done many times before, just to mention the Perl Harbor attack, and many times after that. It is the same old American way in internationl affairs. It has not changed so far and it most likely will not. Currently, we see it play out in a similar way in Lebanon against Syria. Same old tactics, only the names change.

"The fact is that the Russians were enticed to intervene in Afghanistan because of the aforementioned aid and weaponry that the the US was supplying to the Feudal warlords who were seeking to overthrow the socialist government of Taraki - the one that had begun to reform and open up Afghan society."

"Question: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against secret involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didn't believe them. However, there was a basis of truth. You don't regret anything today?"

"Brzezinski: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter, in substance: We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.

Me: Brzezinski and regrets? Psychopaths do not has regrets. No conscience. No empathy for Afghan women.

"Question: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic fundamentalists, having given arms and advice to future terrorists?"

"Brzezinski: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?

Me: apparently, it seems that the answer is easy, but the truth is that it was the CIA that trained the future terrorists laid foundation for the current unrest in the Middle East.

"So not only did the US successfully give Russia its "Vietnam" it also succeeded in removing the socialist government of Tariki, replacing it with the regime of the Feudal warlords, you know, the ones that promote the murdering of women if they are not virgins on their wedding night."

"Question: Some stirred-up Moslems? But it has been said and repeated: Islamic fundamentalism represents a world menace today."

"Indeed, not only does the US government allege that Islamic fundamentalism represents a world menace, but they also allege that the 19 hijackers on September 11th 2001 were trained, aided and abetted by the Taleban warlords that the US essentially placed in power."

"If only we could encourage Laura Bush to expose herself to the truth about Afghanistan's history she might find it a little easier to "imagine how the idea of denying girls an education, of never allowing girls to go to school", can come about."

"Heck! We might even get her to understand why, despite the "liberation" bestowed on the Iraqi people by her husband, twice as many Iraqi children are now going hungry than under Saddam...

Me: the article shows very well how the Bush junta deceives the US public to wage its wars in the Middle East. However, it is not so easy to deceive people if they know the history. If you want to know the future, study the history as the saying goes...

Sunday, March 13, 2005

Just Another Bush Lie - Saddam's Capture

Left and right. Wherever you look, you will find lies and deception from mouth of US administration. This time this is about the Saddam capturing operation by MIKE WHITNEY:

Sergeant Nadim Abou Rabeh, who participated in the operation that netted Saddam, was quoted in the Saudi newspaper "Al-Medina" saying that the Iraqi leader was actually captured the day before and that "the public version of his capture was fabricated." The entire event was apparently choreographed by a Pentagon public relations team.

Knowing Rumsfeld skills in propaganda, I would not be supprized if the entire capture was staged. One thing Rummy hates is truth. Why would he reveal the real capture if he could take adventage of such an opportunity for propaganda? It is not in his style.

"I was among the 20 man unitwho searched for Saddam for 3 days in the area of Dour near Tikrit, and we found him in a modest home in a small village and not in a hole as announced," Rabeh admitted. (UPI )

Oops. The truth starts showing its ugly face...

"Not in a hole"? You mean Saddam actually stood up and faced American Marines?

Exactly, he actually fought? He was not affraid of Americans? How come?


FIECE RESISTANCE? Now, we start to understand why Rummy could not afford to reveal the real story. It did not fit his needs of war propaganda.

"So, we can add another fairytale to the Bush chronicle of deception. The Saddam capture will feature prominently along with the other wartime fictions like Pat Tillman, Jessica Lynch, the phantom WMDs, and the toppling of Saddam's statue in Fidros Square. Every one of these was skillfully fashioned by a Bush PR team trying to maximize public approval by creating a storybook narrative. It's 100% baloney."

To make the story even deeper and more spin-doctored I think it was not even original Saddam, but his double, as expressed by Saddam's real wife. So, you have lying about how alleged Saddam was captured and lying about the fact it was not even Saddam, but his double, all embedded in one big lie of liberation of Iraq.

By deception they shall do wars... and they do.

Monday, February 28, 2005

Conning the public.

I have found an interesting piece I would like to quote today.

It is about how the government is conning the public. Here we go:

"Are you an idiot? Are you incapable of grasping the most elementary facts and making deductions based on those facts? Most politicians and government leaders believe so. How else can you explain the discrepancy between their public statements and their subsequent private actions?"

Me: I guess they are so self assured that they have the upper hand over the public that they do not bother to keep up appearances.

"Take Bush's recent visit to Europe for example. Despite the public show of warm handshakes, back slapping and statements about "unity", a quick read between the lines shows that transatlantic relationships are as strained as ever. Bush achieved little from his jolly to Europe, yet clearly there was a concerted effort made to convince us all that a new era of peace and prosperity is just around the corner. Just what is it that they are trying to hide? Are things really that bad?"

Me: they must be. With a lunatic puppet at the steering wheel things are just about to get really interesting this year. How about an economic meltdown in the US? Sounds probable? Let's wait and see.

"You better believe it."

"Things are so bad in fact that, as the days and months roll by, our leaders are going to ask us to accept increasingly outlandish and ridiculous notions as fact, all in the name of keeping the people dumbed-down. And they fully expect most of us to swallow the bait."

Me: I do not swallow the bait. How about you?

"Of course, our leaders have had a lot of practice over the years to perfect the art of conning the public. In fact, it seems that the power wielded by our "elected" representatives is inversely proportional to the accuracy of the knowledge within the public domain. The dumber the people - the richer the politicians. Of course, we are not saying that all the lies and deceptions passed off on the public over the years have been easy to spot. But there certainly have been some real 'doozies'. JFK was one. Bush's "election" in 2000 was another. Really, it doesn't get much more obvious - unless you're talking about Israel."

Me: by deception, as the saying goes...

"Indeed, if we are still in any doubt about the fact that that our leaders credit us with as much intelligence as the average sock-puppet, look no further than the size of the holes in the stories coming out of the 'holie land'."

Me: sooner then later the holes will get so big that the manipulation becomes apparent. What then?

"Two days ago someone detonated some kind of explosive device outside of a Tel Aviv disco, killing 4 Israelis. Of course, even before the mainstream media informed us about the culprits, we were expected to already be muttering "damn terrorists" under our breath. But rather than go on about how ridiculous the mainstream media treatment of the story was, let's just spell out the facts."

"Israel has been at some level of war with it's Arab nations for over 50 years - continuously. The primary cause of the conflict is land with religion used as the touch paper to keep the conflict at or just under boiling point. If we were to sift through the many details that could be argued by both sides, we would end up with a single fact: Israel expropriated (or had expropriated for it) land that was occupied by another group of people, who Israel then forcibly ejected. The basis for this action is the claim by Israelis that the land that they annexed was always theirs by "divine right"."

Me: divine right? What the heck is that? Curious is this God that allows one group of people to invade and kill other group? Is this God or maybe Satan? I bet the latter, though I am aware the truth goes much deeper than that.

"Think about this. This is underlying reason for the current Middle East conflict. Now put yourself in the position of Ariel Sharon or any advocate of Israel's divine right to Middle Eastern lands. Knowing the unlawfulness upon which you claims are made, and knowing that the Palestinian people are justified in their reclamations against you, where is THE LAST PLACE that you would want to find yourself?"

"Clearly it is the negotiating table."

Me: thus the permanent war in the Middle East.

"For someone like Sharon, peace means defeat. This is a clearly discernible FACT."

"Come back now to the events of the last few days and weeks. The Palestinians have a new leader who is determined to do everything he can to acquiesce to Israeli demands and thereby force them to the negotiating table. At the beginning, Abbas seemed to make some progress, with concessions over security being offered by the Israelis. Then, suddenly and inexplicably, an attack on Israeli civilians comes just a few days before a scheduled international Middle East peace talks in London. "

Me: how predictable...

"Immediately, Israel blames the Palestinians and all concessions previously offered are withdrawn. Now, given that this outcome could have been predicted even by a sock-puppet, is it really reasonable to believe that a Palestinian group would knowingly destroy any chances for a just and peaceful settlement, something they have been fighting for for so many years?"

Me: I guess it is becoming apparent that this is not the Palestinian terrorists that are staging these atacks, but somebody else. It is not so difficult to guess who.

"Apparently, most Western governments and the mainstream media want us to believe that it is, and, more to the point, they think that that average citizen is stupid enough to be fooled. "

"The question that each of us must answer is: Am I really as stupid as my government thinks I am? Am I going to prove them right or wrong? Do I remember how to get indignant when someone treats me as if I were an idiot?"

Me: very good question, indeed. I leave my reader with it.

Till next time.

White Ace

Thursday, February 17, 2005

The plot thickens ...

ASSASSINATIONS Hariri Buried in Lebanon Today

"Even as Rafik Harrari's funeral takes place the Israelis are
announcing Iran will be able to make nuclear weapons this year
and top Syrian officials are in Iran announcing a closer mutual
security pact which comes on the heels of expanding relations
between the two US/Israeli targeted countries with China and Russia."

Me: I wonder what leaders of US/Israeli think about this. In my opinion, it only adds more nuclear power to the Middle East equation.

Why Israel is so worried by the fact that Iran is about to develop nuclear bomb? Does it fear competition in this field from Arab states? Is it jealous of being the only country in the Middle East possessing nuclear arsenal? Or is it simply afraid? Or maybe there is some evil plot in minds of Israeli leaders and Iran's possession of nuclear bomb is really inconvenient for them. 'the Axis of Good' countries, forgive me my sarcasm, may be forced to be more careful as the result. Or maybe it does not really matter as they will do what they plan regardless of the nuclear arsenal of Iran. However, if China takes the Iran's side, then, oops, Huston, we have a problem.

Anyhow, as the situation develops with every day we near the inevitable: the war in the Middle East, possibly of nuclear nature.

Or maybe I am too pessimistic? I hope I am.

White Ace.

Wednesday, February 16, 2005

Oops, they did it again...


Late Hariri's consultant: Hariri's assassination by Mossad aimed at creating tension in Lebanon


"Tehran, Feb 15, IRNA -- Late Lebanese politician Rafiq Hariri's consultant Mustafa al-Naser told IRNA Monday evening, "Assassination
Hariri is the Israeli intelligence agency, Mossad's job, aimed at creating political tension in Lebanon."
Seems the wheels of the greatest intelligence agency are turning again, grainding Arab politicians as they go. It seems that war in Iraq and Afganistan was not enough for the forces seeking to spread war in the Middle East. Curiously, both of the countries leading these efforts proclaim they seek and spread peace! Sharon is called Peace Maker! Deception. If you want to understand the reality use the mirror - the opposite what is being said by leaders of the nations waging the war is closer to truth. When they speak about peace they seek war. Just like Orwell described it in his prophetic book '1984'.

Observations of some curious minds:

Mossad Murders Former Lebanese PM in Carbon Copy of 1979 Assassination

"As we noted yesterday: Three Mossad agents who could pass for Arabs crossed into Lebanon and entered the city. One rented a car. The second wired a series of bombs into its chasis, roof, and door panels. The third agent parked the car along the route the "Red Prince" traveled to his office every morning. Using precise timing Rafi Eitan had provided, the car was set to explode as PLO chief Salameh passed. It did, blowing him to pieces."

"Let's face it, all of the hallmarks of a Mossad operation are there. As an article in today's Economist states:"

"Some detect the work of an intelligence service—if not Syria’s, some other foreign power’s—in the method of the attack. Certainly, the size and sophistication of the bomb suggest it was the work of a well-organised and experienced group, or a government. The blast was big enough to leave a huge crater and shatter windows hundreds of metres away. Moreover, it was sophisticated enough to defeat jamming mechanisms, which the billionaire Mr Hariri’s convoy always used while travelling, to forestall such remotely triggered attacks. Mr Hariri, who made his fortune in construction in Saudi Arabia, knew he had many enemies and took what countermeasures he could."

Trademarks of Mossad. The Middle East is full of them in every Arab nation. Even the Economist is hinting that it was the Mossad. I wonder what state of Israel wants to achieve through such operations? Definitely not the peace they all talk about. Rather they are clearly going into the direction of total war in their own region. What is the next thing they are going to do? Who is next?

With eyes wide open.

White Ace